Construction Tech vs RegTech Churn Rate
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, updated March 2026.
RegTech has a lower monthly churn rate (1%) than Construction Tech (2.2%), a difference of 1.2 percentage points. RegTech median ARPU is $420 versus $220 for Construction Tech.
Head-to-head benchmarks
| Metric | Construction Tech | RegTech |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly churn | 2.2% | 1% |
| Annual churn | 23.6% | 11.4% |
| Median ARPU | $220 | $420 |
| Typical customer base | 100-5,000 | 50-1,000 |
Top construction tech churn drivers
- Project completed and company downsized software stack33%
- General contractor mandated a specific platform for the project24%
- Field adoption failed due to mobile and offline limitations22%
- Insufficient integration with estimating or ERP tools13%
Top regtech churn drivers
- Regulatory rule change that product had not yet implemented28%
- Financial institution internalized compliance workflow26%
- Acquisition of customer eliminated the compliance function20%
- Product could not scale to new jurisdiction or regulatory body16%
Why regtech retains better than construction tech
The 1.2-point gap between RegTech and Construction Tech reflects differences in switching cost, value density, and purchase motivation. RegTech customers face higher integration and data-migration friction, which extends tenure. Construction Tech tends to have more fragmented alternatives and weaker lock-in. Details in each benchmark page above.
Want to see how your own churn stacks up against these benchmarks?
Paste cancellation feedback and get your Churn Health Grade in 30 seconds. No signup required.