Construction Tech vs Healthcare SaaS Churn Rate
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, updated March 2026.
Healthcare SaaS has a lower monthly churn rate (1.4%) than Construction Tech (2.2%), a difference of 0.8 percentage points. Healthcare SaaS median ARPU is $320 versus $220 for Construction Tech.
Head-to-head benchmarks
| Metric | Construction Tech | Healthcare SaaS |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly churn | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Annual churn | 23.6% | 15.9% |
| Median ARPU | $220 | $320 |
| Typical customer base | 100-5,000 | 100-2,000 |
Top construction tech churn drivers
- Project completed and company downsized software stack33%
- General contractor mandated a specific platform for the project24%
- Field adoption failed due to mobile and offline limitations22%
- Insufficient integration with estimating or ERP tools13%
Top healthcare saas churn drivers
- EHR or practice management system switch forced migration31%
- HIPAA compliance concerns or audit failure24%
- Budget cuts in hospital or clinic IT19%
- Product lacking clinical workflow integrations14%
Why healthcare saas retains better than construction tech
The 0.8-point gap between Healthcare SaaS and Construction Tech reflects differences in switching cost, value density, and purchase motivation. Healthcare SaaS customers face higher integration and data-migration friction, which extends tenure. Construction Tech tends to have more fragmented alternatives and weaker lock-in. Details in each benchmark page above.
Want to see how your own churn stacks up against these benchmarks?
Paste cancellation feedback and get your Churn Health Grade in 30 seconds. No signup required.